There Is A 100% Chance That NATO Is Going To Trigger TOTAL NUCLEAR WAR In The Next Year On Our Current Trajectory, Warns Respected Economist Martin Armstrong

Martin Armstrong, an economist has warned of a 100% chance of NATO triggering a total nuclear war within the next year, citing current geopolitical tensions and historical economic cycles he claims to predict.

Armstrong also alleges connections between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s operations and the GENIUS Act, suggesting it establishes a covert war bond system, potentially destabilizing the financial system further, as criticized by some experts who draw parallels to pre-Civil War private currency issues.

Armstrong’s interview elaborates upon the ongoing concerns about NATO’s military posture and economic policies, with recent statements from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte warning of Russia’s potential readiness to attack within five years, highlighting a tense international climate that could exacerbate the risks Armstrong describes.

WATCH:

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: There Is A 100% Chance That NATO Is Going To Trigger TOTAL NUCLEAR WAR In The Next Year On Our Current Trajectory, Warns Respected Economist Martin Armstrong

Armstrong Also Reveals Who Was Really Behind Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell’s Operation As Well… pic.twitter.com/JqJJirPG6X

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 22, 2025

NATO tensions

Current Tensions: Ukraine Conflict: The war in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, has been a major flashpoint. NATO has provided extensive military and financial support to Ukraine, including training, equipment, and intelligence, which Russia perceives as a direct threat. This support has included advanced weaponry and systems, escalating the conflict’s intensity.

Military Buildup and Exercises: NATO has significantly increased its military presence in Eastern Europe, conducting large-scale exercises and deploying additional troops and equipment to member states bordering Russia and Ukraine. This includes the establishment of multinational battle groups in countries like Poland, the Baltic states, and Romania. Russia has responded with its own military maneuvers and increased defense spending, further heightening tensions.

Cyber and Hybrid Warfare: Both NATO and Russia have accused each other of engaging in cyber-attacks and hybrid warfare tactics, such as disinformation campaigns, sabotage, and assassination plots. These actions have added a non-kinetic dimension to the conflict, increasing the risk of escalation.

NATO Expansion: Russia’s long-standing opposition to NATO’s eastward expansion has been a persistent source of tension. The potential membership of Ukraine and Georgia in NATO remains a highly contentious issue, with Russia viewing it as a direct threat to its security.

Nuclear Posture: Both NATO and Russia have modernized their nuclear arsenals and doctrines, leading to concerns about the risk of nuclear escalation. NATO’s deterrence strategy includes a mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defense capabilities, while Russia has lowered the threshold for nuclear weapon use in its military doctrine.

Recent Developments: 2025 NATO Summit: At the NATO Summit in The Hague, allies committed to significant defense spending increases, aiming for 5% of GDP by 2035, with a focus on core military requirements and security-related expenditures. This move is seen as a response to the perceived threat from Russia and other global challenges.

Rutte’s Warnings: NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has warned that Russia could be ready to attack a NATO country within five years, urging member states to prepare accordingly. This statement underscores the urgency and severity of the current tensions.
Economic and Financial Strain: The economic sanctions imposed on Russia by Western countries, including NATO members, have strained global markets, particularly in energy and finance. Russia’s response, including capital controls and regulatory restrictions, has further complicated international business operations and increased compliance risks.

Implications: The tensions between NATO and Russia have broader implications for global stability, economic markets, and international security. The risk of miscalculation or escalation remains high, given the military buildup, cyber activities, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Economists like Martin Armstrong have warned of potential economic fallout, including the possibility of a nuclear conflict, which could have catastrophic consequences.In summary, NATO tensions with Russia are multifaceted, involving military, cyber, economic, and diplomatic dimensions, with the Ukraine conflict serving as a central catalyst. The situation remains volatile, with both sides engaged in a delicate balance of deterrence and response.

4 web pages

Explain Ukraine conflict

NATO Russia history

Epstein connections