Patrick King represented himself in court after being fined $1200 dollars for protesting against the unlawful Covid mandates, he slew the beast and emerged VICTORIOUS.
He issued a subpoena to the Provincial Health Minister for proof that the so-called Covid-19 Virus exists, and they were forced to admit that they had no evidence whatsoever.
The virus (known as COVID-19) had never been isolated, and thus the government had no legal grounds to impose any of the punishing restrictions they have inflicted on society.
Since this shocking evidence came to light, the Province (Alberta) has since rescinded all Covid-Restrictions and now officially treats Covid-19 as nothing more than a mild flu!
King has shown the template to be followed WORLDWIDE. This is what can happen when you are not re-presented by a BAR (British Accredited Registry) Lawyer who’s first obligation is to the Courts, the CROWN, the BAR Society, and not to their clients.
court file #2110 00751
Deena Hinshaw Vs. Patrick King
Patrick King was fined $1,200 for violating the Alberta Public Health Act for being in a group larger than 10 on Dec 05.20 in Red Deer, Alberta.
In court on May 04, 2021, Patrick produced information needed to request, to support a good plausible defence. The material Patrick requested was ‘isolation’ of the SARS-COV-2 virus.
Patrick was supposed to be in court on May 18. As a self representative, the judge had to advocate for Patrick and steer him in the right direction, at which time the judge allowed Patrick to subpoena Deena Hinshaw, Chief Medical Officer of Health for Alberta. Patrick’s defence was that he needed proof of ‘isolation’ of the SARS-COV2 virus from Deena Hinshaw, which would give her the science to back the Alberta Public Health Act.
CMOH Has No Material Evidence … to provide Mr King for his defence, which means everything Patrick requested in Schedule A i.e. ‘isolation’ of the SARS-COV-2 virus that needs to be 100% isolated in order to base scientific facts on these public health acts, you don’t have material evidence for this, and they said “No.”
Patrick reiterated to the judge, “Your Honor, just for the record. I want it to be on the record duly noted that the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Alberta does not have the material evidence I request to which the judge responded “Yes, they did say that”.
Her Majesty the Queen Vs. Patrick King
Patrick was misled by the court system, which is a violation of his rights as a Canadian citizen. Patrick returned to court July 24.21 where Attorney General prosecutors from Ottawa were present in the courtroom.
The statement read ‘Her Majesty the Queen Vs. Patrick King.’ The accuser is now the Queen and Patrick gets to address his accuser.
UPDATE WITH LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
Letter to Patrick James King (Service)
LAW relied on by the Applicant
Affidavit of Krisztina Grech Sworn July 16 2021